Final Project
(Yobucko.com-Student Loan Debt Statistics)
Before I was in college, the term “student loan debt” meant very little to me. When I heard those words, I used to think of Harvard or becoming a lawyer or a doctor. I only associated debt with going to extremely expensive schools, and it never occurred to me that most students (in this day and age) graduate with a significant amount of debt. One of the factors that influence a student’s debt level is interest rates on their loans. Interest rates vary depending on the type of loan a student takes out. This infographic demonstrates most of the loan types that are made available to students.
(American Student Assistance)
While student loan debt is a serious crisis that affects the entire country, it differs from section to section of the United States. This information, which I received from a blog titled “Tuition.IO- Student Loans Made Simple, depicts the average debt that a student will be in depending on where they live. As seen in this infographic, the east cost contains more private universities, and private universities are more expensive. Ivy League universities, such as Harvard, Princeton and Yale are located on the east coast. The west coast possesses more public universities, which are less expensive than private institutions, so students who attend universities on the west coast generally have lower amounts of debt.
While the amount of debt among students differs across the country, it also varies from within the state. If you look at this graphic, you’ll see the majority of public universities in the state of Illinois, the graduation rate of the university, and the total percentage of students at that university that has student loans. In some schools, such as Northern Illinois, Southern Illinois at Carbondale, Western Illinois and Eastern Illinois, the percentage of students with student loans is higher than the total graduation rate of the university. Personally, this never occurred to me as a possibility, and this statistic saddened me. It saddened me because it made me realize that, for some students, even with student loans, college still isn’t affordable. In my opinion, education is a right, not a privilege. Nobody should be denied the right to go to college just because you can’t afford it.
Also in this graphic, you can see that in all of these schools, the percentage of students with student loans is higher than 50%. This displays that most students in this country couldn’t afford college without the help of financial aid.
(Yobucko.com-Student Loan Debt Statistics)
In finance, a “default” occurs when a debtor fails to pay a debt that he or she has been required to pay. In the case of student loans, a default rate occurs when a person who has taken out student loans is unable to pay them back. In this infographic exhibits the default rates on student loans and their various types. I was surprised to learn that the national average was 8.8%. This means that 8.8% of Americans don’t pay back their student loans. If almost 10% of borrowers can’t repay their debt, then I believe that something within our government has to change.
(Tuition IO-Student Loans Made Simple)
Something that has recently been in the news is HR 1716, which is the proposed legislation that would change all student loan repayments for new graduates into Income-Based Repayment (IBR). This means that, no matter what you owe, you would never receive a loan payment you couldn’t afford since the payments would be based off of your income. While, on the outside, this looks great, it isn’t. The plan eliminates the forgiveness option that is currently associated with IBR, so while the payments may be lower, they could last permanently. This means that federal government would profit greatly from this.
(http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/25/federal-student-loan-profit/3696009/)
This graphic demonstrates just how much Congress profits from student loans. Last year, Congress made $41.3 billion on student loans. This is enough money to provide maximum-level Pell Grants of $5,645 to 7.3 million college students. So, why didn’t they? If the government doesn’t have students’ best interests, why should we trust them with our finances?